Goldman Sachs Group Inc.. (GS) Gender Bias to persuade
a federal appeals court to rule that the former management of women
directors should pursue cases of gender discrimination by
arbitration and not in court. Yesterday, the New York-based panel ruled that Lisa Parisi,
One in three women who sued the company in 2010 claiming they
charged for pay and promotion discrimination, can not maintain
his case to federal court. Employment contracts contain
clause requiring disputes to be resolved by arbitration. Parisi's lawyers argued their client has the right under
federal law to press his claim to Goldman Sachs has a pattern and
discrimination against managing directors
women, and that such claims can only be litigated in the context of
a class action, or group, lawsuit. A lower court judge agreed, rejecting demands by Goldman Sachs
He ordered the case to arbitration Parisi. "Because we do not agree that the important legal right to
pursue the claim patterns or practices exist, we reverse, "the U.S.
Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote for the unanimous three-
Judges panel. Participating Judge Gerard Lynch him and Reena Raggi. Implementation of the agreement citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the panel says
High Court continuous mapapakahulugan Federal Arbitration
Acting as a support to the implementation of the agreement, "even
the claim at issue claim of federal law, "absent some
Contrary congressional command. The appeals court said Parisi to attend
jury evidence of discriminatory practices or policies
Goldman Sachs affecting their work. Adam Klein, an attorney for Parisi, not immediately
yesterday to respond to a phone message seeking comment on
court decisions. Michael DuVally, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs,
an e-mail stating that the company is satisfied with the court
decision. Case Parisi v. Goldman Sachs & Co, U.S. Second
a federal appeals court to rule that the former management of women
directors should pursue cases of gender discrimination by
arbitration and not in court. Yesterday, the New York-based panel ruled that Lisa Parisi,
One in three women who sued the company in 2010 claiming they
charged for pay and promotion discrimination, can not maintain
his case to federal court. Employment contracts contain
clause requiring disputes to be resolved by arbitration. Parisi's lawyers argued their client has the right under
federal law to press his claim to Goldman Sachs has a pattern and
discrimination against managing directors
women, and that such claims can only be litigated in the context of
a class action, or group, lawsuit. A lower court judge agreed, rejecting demands by Goldman Sachs
He ordered the case to arbitration Parisi. "Because we do not agree that the important legal right to
pursue the claim patterns or practices exist, we reverse, "the U.S.
Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote for the unanimous three-
Judges panel. Participating Judge Gerard Lynch him and Reena Raggi. Implementation of the agreement citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the panel says
High Court continuous mapapakahulugan Federal Arbitration
Acting as a support to the implementation of the agreement, "even
the claim at issue claim of federal law, "absent some
Contrary congressional command. The appeals court said Parisi to attend
jury evidence of discriminatory practices or policies
Goldman Sachs affecting their work. Adam Klein, an attorney for Parisi, not immediately
yesterday to respond to a phone message seeking comment on
court decisions. Michael DuVally, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs,
an e-mail stating that the company is satisfied with the court
decision. Case Parisi v. Goldman Sachs & Co, U.S. Second
No comments:
Post a Comment